Consumer Reports Flubs Child Seat Study

Consumer_report_seat

The magazine that likes to be known for pointing out dangerous or defective products had to do a bit of spin control itself today. Earlier this month, Consumer Reports released a study that showed 10 out of 12 popular child-safety seats on the market failed its crash tests.

Turns out, that’s because the magazine used a significantly tougher test than the federal government does to come to its conclusions.

In testing child-safety seats, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration only performs frontal crash tests simulating speeds of 30 mph; it forgoes the use of side-impact crash data, which some see as a major flaw because today’s new cars are also given side-impact crash-test ratings. That’s why Consumer Reports wanted to step in and do its own side-impact tests.

The government’s side-impact tests for new cars simulate a crash at a speed of 38 mph. Consumer Reports intended to apply the same standard — 38 mph — to show what such a crash would do to popular child-safety seats. Instead, it carried out the tests at more than 70 mph, or highway speeds. Obviously, that type of impact is not typical. After Consumer Reports released its study, NHTSA retested the seats in side-impact crashes using its regular 38-mph procedure and they all passed and did not become loose.

An official announcement from Consumer Reports about the erroneous study came today; the magazine apologized for the error but didn’t mention how drastically off the tests were.

Whatever the result, we can say this: The two seats that passed the 70-mph test will probably still sell better than the rest.

[Consumer Reports Recalls Car Seat Study, CNNMoney.com]



Related posts:



Related posts:



Share this post!

Bookmark and Share

0 коммент.:

Отправить комментарий